PMG is 10.105.150.3 and e-mail server is 10.105.150.2.įor the record, here is the output from a 'pmgconfig dump':Ĭomposed.wl_bounce_relays = _check_path = /usr/local/bin/pmg-custom-check
What's strange to me is the PMG was working as intended and all checks were passing until I started the hardening procedure!Ĭomposed.wl_bounce_relays = pmg.localdomain If I take the PMG out of the mix and direct all traffic through the mail server, everything's working as expected. Traffic is proxied via HAProxy through the WireGuard tunnel to my local network. SMTP Server Settings: Server: Port: 587 / 465 SSL: Enabled Username: User/Pass. I'm running my servers locally, behind a public VPS linked via VPN, but nothing too crazy. I kind of figured that, but something is apparently incorrectly configured somewhere. to the email server, almost always 25 (SMTP) but can be 465 or 587. I know I can set a flag to inhibit overwrites, but I don't believe that is the correct way to address this. Port (default 25): The port number used by the email server. Update: After setting the search domain in /etc/nf, and creating a /etc//base file, adding the correct nameservers and search domain, and running 'resolveconf -u' it resets, wiping out the search domain. Proxmox-mailgateway: 7.1-1 (API: 7.1-2/75d043b3, running kernel: 5.13.19-6-pve)Īny and all assistance would be GREATLY appreciated! Here is the only link I could find for a similar issue, but it's still far off from what I'm pmgversion -v Use of uninitialized value $domain in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/share/perl5/PMG/Utils.pm line 643. Now, it's showing up as a possible open relay and TLS is not working! Somewhere, I found these instructions for PMG Harden, which I followed down to adding GeoIP, and now I receive the following error when I run pmgconfig sync -restart pmgconfig sync -restart 1 SurgeMail is a fully functional SMTP / IMAP / POP / Webmail server. When I tested using MXToolbox, all checks were passing. SPF, DKIM, DMARC Configured - PORT: 587 - SSL: Yes We always tested for Inbox GMAIL. So far, I followed the instructions in the forum for configuring custom bounce messages here and here and Quarantine Web Interface Via Nginx Proxy, and all seemed to be working well. I haven't yet purchased a subscription because I'd like to get everything in place and test it out. I just moved from a SurgeMail/SurgeVault system to a conventional malfurious/postfix setup, and I incorporated a PMG into the mix to test things out. that your email SurgeMail is a fully functional SMTP / IMAP / POP / Webmail server. > 220 .us SurgeSMTP (Version 5.I've been searching the forum for several hours (and the internet in general), and I'm not finding anything useful. > From a command prompt I checked port 587 using telnet and this is what I get: > From a command prompt I checked port 25 using telnet and this is what I get: I don’t think this is anything to do with that since everything has been working until mid-morning today. > The only changes that have been made in the last couple days to the server were the installation of a digital certificate yesterday morning. If I switch back to port 25 I get the time outs. > Last ditch effort… I changed the smtp port from 25 to 587 and my machine will now send. > Surgeweb is working fine… no problems there.
> SurgeMail Version 5.0m-1, Built 21:02:04, Platform Linux (Surgeweb Enabled) We had to switch each of the customers to use port 587 and. 17:58:11 SMTP -> getlines(): str is 220 SurgeSMTP (Version. In my area, at&t did that without notification years back and we'd suddenly get calls from groups of customers living in the same area. I checked my own outlook (2007) and sure enough same problem. Sounds like your provider has blocked port 25 if you are telnetting in over the internet. They all receive the “time-out” message communicating with the server. > Suddenly today I started receiving calls from my Outlook and Thunderbird users who are having problems sending messages. On Oct 27, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Chris Guest wrote:
Surgemail port 587 mac#
My mac mail program has port 25 and 587 built in as options, so that might be why it's only occuring on some versions and not all.
0 kommentar(er)
